Background
It has recently been confirmed by the
Chairman of the Indonesian Parliament (Dewan
Perwakilan Rakyat, DPR), Bambang Soesatyo that four bills are in the
planning for approval by the DPR, by 25 July 2019.
One of the bills is a bill on an amendment
to Law No.5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopolistic and Unfair Business
Competition Practices (Competition Law
Bill).
According to the DPR website and its social media, the
DPR is optimistic that despite the fact that the Government and the Parliament
are still in discussions regarding the Competition Law Bill, they are targeting
that the Competition Law Bill will be approved as scheduled.
Progress
of the Competition Law Bill
Our observation on the progress of the Competition Law
Bill indicates that it still requires extensive discussion due to the
significant amount of items in the Competition Law Bill that need to be
discussed, as set out in the bill’s Inventory List of Issues (Daftar
Inventaris Masalah, DIM).
This prospect becomes much more pessimistic given that most
members of the Parliament, in the aftermath of the legislative elections, are
now focused on securing their re-elections, as opposed to discussing the Competition
Law Bill (some of them might be reelected while others will not).
However, if the Competition Law Bill were to be approved, there would be several fundamental changes:
Fundamental Changes to:
|
Discussion and updates
|
Administrative
Fines
|
Parliament
has suggested administrative fines of up to 30% of the total value of the
violation during the period that such violation was committed, whereas the
Government has suggested a lower administrative fine of up to 25%.
|
Merger
Notifications
|
Merger
notifications will be mandatory before the M&A in question is effectively
carried out, whereas previously only a post-merger notification was
required.
Furthermore,
the scope of M&A notifications will also be expanded to cover the
establishment of JVs and the acquisition of assets, and a fine of a maximum
of 30% of the total value of the transaction will be imposed for late
notification.
|
Leniency Programs
|
The Competition
Law Bill introduces a leniency program, further details of which will be set
out in an implementing regulation.
However, the Government has suggested removing this leniency program,
based on a number of considerations.
|
Exceptions
|
Currently,
the article for exemptions in Law No.5/1999 (the current Competition Law) can
only be granted by such Law. The Government, in its DIM, suggested that
these exceptions be granted by its implementing regulations. In the Competition
Law Bill, the Parliament has removed the exception for Intellectual Property
Rights (IPR).
|
Interlocutory
Decisions
|
The Competition
Law Bill grants authority to the Commission for the Supervision of Business
Competition (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, KPPU) to issue
Interlocutory Decisions upon the commencement of an examination, prior to the
KPPU making a final decision.
|
Extraterritoriality
|
If approved, the Competition
Law Bill will also introduce a new provision. The implementation of the
“extraterritoriality” principle is based on the “effects doctrine”, whereby
the KPPU may impose penalties under the Competition Law on business actors
domiciled outside Indonesia that have violated the Law and have a negative
impact on the market in Indonesia.
|
Abuse of
Dominant Bargaining Position
|
This
provision is mandated by Law No.20 of 2008 on Micro-, Small- and Medium-Scale
Businesses, which requires the KPPU to supervise the partnership between
Micro-, Small- and Medium-Scale Business owners and big business actors, such
as the trend of inti-plasma relationships in large-scale plantations
and livestock farms. However, further implementing regulations will be
required before the KPPU can implement this provision.
|
Institutional
status and strengthening of the KPPU’s role
|
The Competition
Law Bill proposes that the KPPU should have the authority to, with the
assistance of the Police, compel business actors to submit investigation
documents.
Furthermore,
it raises the KPPU’s institutional status to that of a Commissioner as a
state official.
|
Payment of
10% of value of fine if objecting to a KPPU decision
|
This
provision will apply to business actors that have been imposed with a penalty
by the KPPU and intend to submit an objection. They must first deposit
a payment of 10%.
|
***
We will proactively
monitor the development of the Competition Law Bill and keep you updated, as
more information becomes available.
*This article has been uploaded in: Soemadipradja & Taher and the pdf file can be downloaded via this link.
**Picture courtesy of Vietnam Briefing
#CompetitionLaw #AntitrustLaw #Indonesia #KPPU #Compliance #MergerControl
#CompetitionLaw #AntitrustLaw #Indonesia #KPPU #Compliance #MergerControl